Foxcoon Example

Child Labour Apple/Foxcoon Example Child Labour: Apple/Foxcoon â€" Research Paper Example > Child labour issues in Apple/Foxconn Child labour is the hiring of children in any labour that inhibits them to attend to school regularly and robs their childhood. This act is physically, mentally, morally, socially harmful and dangerous. Child labour is prohibited by legislation all over the world. Child labour is employing anyone 18 years and below. Foxconn technology group is a world-wide electronics contract producing company with headquarters in Tucheng, new Taipei, Taiwan. By revenue it is the third-largest information technology firm. It manufactures above forty percent of electronic products worldwide. Foxconn is the main manufacturer of apple’s products and other renowned electronic creators. Foxconn has over one million employees, it is china’s most prominent and largest private employer. Foxconn has been in multiple controversies over the last few years. Its labourers work in harsh conditions and they experience safety problems. In order to reduce its cost of produ ction and the need to have flexible labour, Foxconn has been employing under age workers. In 2010, suicides that happened in the company brought to labour shortage. The provincial government of Henan helped with the Gap by leading 100,000 students to work as interns in the Shenzhen manufacturing companies. Students were provided with a nine day notice and told that those who will decline to comply shall not be permitted to graduate. In Foxconn interns have now become an important component in its labour force comprising of fifteen percent of the labour force. This makes Foxconn the biggest internship program worldwide that forces interns to work rather than to learn. Attendance is monitored by teachers in the company and interns as young as 14 have been employed thus violating the Chinese laws. Foxconn uses interns in order to avoid culpability and detection. These interns are deprived of protections and standard benefits and are susceptible to poor working conditions as their adu lt counterparts (Chan, Pun, and Selden, 12) The United States based China Labour watch investigated and found out that the children are given tasks that are similar as adults, they worked in rooms that are not well ventilated and these children were not paid on time. In addition, there salaries were also minimal. Some schools were said to be closed so that students could work in Foxconn companies and were unwillingly required to work for twelve hours a day. Foxconn came out to say that students only make up 2.7 percent of the total workforce and it’s the schools who employ the students under the local government supervision. In addition, the Chinese labour watch said that Foxconn did not take time to check the ages of their employees and it should be accountable for their acts as well as the schools that sent their students. After the Chinese labour watch allegations Foxconn shouldered the blame and apologized to each student adding that employee responsible for the violations will be held to account and terminated from wo rk. In addition, the company admitted to violate the Chinese laws and also its own policy and said that measures are in place to return the students to their learning institutions (Williams, Steve, and Steve Williams, 1). I do not recommend my classmates to support this firms because it denies students opportunities to develop themselves educationally and it is against the law for firms to employ underage staffs. Lastly, I also disagree with this child labour incident because when children are used they are likely to face occupational hazards due to their naivety. Works cited Chan, Jenny, Ngai Pun, and Mark Selden. “The Politics of Global Production: Apple, Foxconn and China’s New Working Class. ” New Technology, Work and Employment 28 (2013): 100â€"115. Web.  Williams, Steve, and Steve Williams. Introducing Employment Relations: A Critical Approach. , 2014. Print.